Bukola Saraki, the president of the Senate, has given reasons why he had to dump the ruling All Progressives Congress and return to the opposition Peoples Democratic Party, PDP.
In a statement issued on Tuesday, July 30, Saraki, who announced his defection through social media accounts, said it was not an easy decision for him to make. He said: “If anything at all, I have tarried for so long and did all that was humanly possible, even in the face of great provocation, ridicule and flagrant persecution, to give opportunity for peace, reconciliation and harmonious existence.
“However, it is after an extensive consultation with all the important stakeholders that we have come to this difficult but inevitable decision to pitch our political tent elsewhere; where we could enjoy greater sense of belonging and where the interests of the greatest number of our Nigeria would be best served,” he said.
Saraki, who said he took full responsibility for the decision, emphasised that it was a decision that had been “inescapably imposed on me by certain elements and forces within the APC who have ensured that the minimum conditions for peace, cooperation, inclusion and a general sense of belonging did not exist.”
The Senate president said: “They have done everything to ensure that the basic rules of party administration, which should promote harmonious relations among the various elements within the party were blatantly disregarded.
“All governance principles, which were required for a healthy functioning of the party and the government, were deliberately violated or undermined. And all entreaties for justice, equity and fairness as a basic precondition for peace and unity, not only within the party, but also the country at large, were simply ignored, or employed as additional pretext for further exclusion.
“The experience of my people and associates in the past three years is that they have suffered alienation and have been treated as outsiders in their own party. Thus, many have become disaffected and disenchanted.
“At the same time, opportunities to seek redress and correct these anomalies were deliberately blocked as a government-within-a-government had formed an impregnable wall and left in the cold, everyone else who was not recognised as ‘one of us.’ This is why my people, like all self-respecting people would do, decided to seek accommodation elsewhere.”
According to him, the framers of Nigeria’s constitution envisaged a degree of benign tension among the three arms of government if the principle of checks and balances must continue to serve as the building block of our democracy.
He said as Senate president and leader of the APC, he ensured that the necessary tension did not escalate at any time in such a way that it could encumber executive function or correspondingly undermine the independence of the legislature.
He added that he had over the years made great efforts in the overall interest of the country, and “in spite of my personal predicament to manage situations that would otherwise have resulted in unsavoury consequences for the government and the administration. My colleagues in the Senate will bear testimony to this.”
Saraki stressed, “However, what we have seen is a situation whereby every dissent from the legislature was framed as an affront to the executive or as part of an agenda to undermine the government itself. The populist notion of anti-corruption became a ready weapon for silencing any form of dissent and for framing even principled objection as ‘corruption fighting back.’
“Persistent onslaught against the legislature and open incitement of the people against their own representatives became a default argument in defence of any short-coming of the government in a manner that betrays all too easily, a certain contempt for the constitution itself or even the democracy that it is meant to serve.
“Unfortunately, the self-serving gulf that has been created between the leadership of the two critical arms of government based on distrust and mutual suspicion has made any form of constructive engagement impossible. Therefore, anything short of a slavish surrender in a way that reduces the legislature to a mere rubber stamp would not have been sufficient in procuring the kind of rapprochement that was desired in the interest of all.”
The Senate president however pointed out that to surrender this way was to be “complicit in the subversion of the institution that remains the very bastion of our democracy.”
He added, “The recent weeks have witnessed a rather unusual attempt to engage with some of these most critical issues at stake. Unfortunately, the discord has been allowed to fester unaddressed for too long, with dire consequences for the ultimate objective of delivering the common good and achieving peace and unity in our country. Any hope of reconciliation at this point was therefore very slim indeed. Most of the horses had bolted from the stable.”
Saraki noted that while Vice-President Yemi Osinbajo, the newly elected National Working Committee of the APC led by Adams Oshiomhole, the national chairman, and state governors were working to reconcile aggrieved members, there were forces who worked against him and his followers in the party.
He said: “The emergence of a new national party executive a few weeks ago held out some hopes, however slender. The new party chairman has swung into action and did his best alongside some of the governors of the APC and His Excellency, the Vice-President. I thank them for all their great efforts to save the day and achieve reconciliation. Even though I thought these efforts were coming late in the day, but seeing the genuine commitment of these gentlemen, I began to think that perhaps it was still possible to reconsider the situation.
“However, as I have realised all along, there are some others in the party leadership hierarchy, who did not think dialogue was the way forward and therefore chose to play the fifth columnists. These individuals went to work and ensured that they scuttled the great efforts and the good intentions of these aforementioned leaders of the party. Perhaps, had these divisive forces not thrown the cogs in the wheel at the last minutes, and in a manner that made it impossible to sustain any trust in the process, the story today would have been different.”
While Saraki said he had returned to the PDP – a party he left for the APC – he alleged that the injustice that forced him out of the then ruling party was now in the current one.“For me, I leave all that behind me. Today, I start as I return to the party where I began my political journey, the PDP.
“When we left the PDP to join the then nascent coalition of APC in 2014, we left in a quest for justice, equity and inclusion; the fundamental principles on which the PDP was originally built but which it had deviated from. We were attracted to the APC by its promise of change. We fought hard along with others and defeated the PDP.
“In retrospect, it is now evident that the PDP has learnt more from its defeat than the APC has learnt from its victory. The PDP that we return to is now a party that has learnt its lesson the hard way and has realised that no member of the party should be taken for granted; a party that has realised that inclusion, justice and equity are basic preconditions for peace; a party that has realised that never again can the people of Nigeria be taken for granted,” Saraki said.
The Senate president expressed his excitement over the new efforts to build “the reborn PDP” on the core principles of promoting democratic values, internal democracy, accountability, inclusion and national competitiveness, genuine commitment to restructuring and devolution of powers as well as abiding belief in zoning of political and elective offices as an inevitable strategy for managing our rich diversity as a people of one great indivisible nation called Nigeria.
“This is the task that I am committing myself to and I believe that it is in this PDP, that I will have the opportunity to play my part. It is my hope that the APC will respect the choice that I have made as my democratic right, and understand that even though we will now occupy a different political space, we do not necessarily become enemies unto one another.”
For a better society